In a recent interview with Breitbart Texas, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) took aim at his opponent, U.S. Representative Colin Allred (D-TX), accusing him of evading scrutiny regarding his “radical open-borders record.” Cruz characterized both Allred and Vice President Kamala Harris as running similar campaigns marked by attempts to distance themselves from their documented voting histories. He asserted that both candidates are trying to avoid accountability for their stances on immigration and border security while relying heavily on extensive television advertising funded by major donations and favorable media coverage to influence voters.
Cruz emphasized the importance of political campaigns being a comparison of candidates’ records, boasting of his own achievements in advocating for Texans over the past 12 years. He contended that he has consistently fought for jobs, freedom, and security, obtaining tangible results. In stark contrast, Cruz pointed out Allred’s voting history, which includes opposition to key legislation aimed at enhancing border security. He highlighted Allred’s votes against building a border wall, the Secure the Border Act, and other measures designed to strengthen immigration enforcement. Cruz accused Allred of skipping a critical vote and claimed he has voted in alignment with Democratic leadership, revealing a pattern that Cruz believes aligns Allred closely with the Biden administration’s contentious border policies.
During a recent debate, Cruz further grilled Allred on his record, stating that Allred voted alongside Nancy Pelosi 100 percent of the time in his early years in the House and with the Biden administration during its initial term. Cruz labeled Allred as an “open borders radical,” equating him to Kamala Harris and stressing the significance of their shared ideologies regarding border management. He referred to Allred’s derogatory remarks about the border wall, which he termed “that racist border wall,” emphasizing Allred’s commitment to dismantling these security measures that Cruz and many constituents support.
Cruz contextualized the importance of the Texas race within the broader scope of the Biden-Harris border crisis, noting that Texas has been significantly impacted by rising levels of migrant encounters. He stated that a majority of these encounters have been concentrated in Texas regions over the duration of the current administration, which is reportedly experiencing a resurgence of large migrant group crossings following a temporary decrease. Cruz’s framing suggests that the pressure at the border continues to be a critical issue that he believes voters should consider as they assess candidates’ positions in the upcoming election.
To underscore the intensity of the campaign climate, Cruz mentioned the substantial financial backing Allred’s campaign has received, attributing over $100 billion from influential Democratic donors, including Senator Chuck Schumer and financier George Soros. This funding, he suggested, is indicative of the national significance of the race and serves as a rallying call for his supporters to increase their engagement and turnout. Cruz positioned the election as a close contest, with recent polling indicating tight margins between the candidates. He urged “common-sense Texans” to step forward and cast their votes to ensure that Cruz’s perspective and vision for Texas prevail.
In conclusion, Senator Cruz’s critique of Representative Colin Allred centers on their contrasting positions regarding border security and immigration policies. Cruz’s argument frames Allred’s voting record as an attempt to align with a progressive agenda that seeks to diminish border security efforts, while Cruz positions himself as a staunch defender of traditional values relating to jobs and safety for Texans. With financial support pouring into the Texas race from national Democratic leaders, Cruz’s campaign strategy emphasizes mobilizing local voters to counter what he views as detrimental policies stemming from the current administration and its allies.
