On Tuesday, MSNBC host Chris Hayes articulated his criticisms of the Electoral College shortly before the network called the election in favor of former President Donald Trump. Hayes recognized that, despite his objections to the system, Trump was poised to be declared the winner according to the rules established by the Electoral College. He called the system “funky and terrible,” noting that it functions in a manner wholly distinct from elections in the rest of the United States and around the world. Hayes underscored that the Electoral College raises significant concerns about the legitimacy of democratic processes and expressed a desire to see the mechanism abolished. He communicated his commitment to transparency in reporting electoral outcomes while stressing the importance of grounding electoral processes in democratic principles.
Despite his criticism of the Electoral College, Hayes acknowledged that there existed a possibility that Trump could win the popular vote as well, which would further legitimize his victory under the existing electoral framework. He stated that if the election was indeed won by Trump, then he must be recognized as the winner according to both the Constitution and the rulings of the Electoral College. This acknowledgment highlights the complicated relationship between the electoral outcome and the manner in which democracy is practiced in the United States, revealing a tension between electoral mechanics and popular sentiment.
Recognizing the wounds of previous political experiences, Hayes recalled the recent violent insurrection led by Trump’s followers, who attacked law enforcement as they sought to undermine President Joe Biden’s electoral legitimacy. This insurrection, he argued, starkly contrasted with the principles of democracy and peaceful power transition that are essential to a functioning democratic society. While grappling with the realities of political violence, he maintained that recognizing an electoral outcome—however contentious—is crucial for the health of American democracy.
Hayes criticized the various institutions, including the Supreme Court and the Republican Party, for their roles in contributing to the current political landscape. He conveyed disappointment with the failures of these institutions in upholding democratic norms, leading the country to a point of potential crisis. However, despite these failings, he adhered to a principle of respect for the constitutional process, reiterating that if Trump wins, it is imperative to accept the outcome, regardless of the myriad issues surrounding how it was reached.
The underlying message of Hayes’ commentary revolved around the idea that American democracy is in a state of ongoing evolution. He argued that while the current electoral outcome might signal a shift, it also necessitates a fundamental reevaluation of how democracy functions and is preserved. The necessity of engaging in a new phase of discourse around democratic values and the governing framework was emphasized. The notion that the preservation of democracy requires active participation and vigilance resonates through his remarks and aligns with the broader discussions surrounding democratic resilience.
As Hayes concluded, he highlighted that the country stands at a crossroads where the principles of democracy must be reaffirmed, and the way forward needs careful consideration. This juncture provides both a challenge and an opportunity to work towards a more inclusive and legitimate democratic process. The possible continuation of Trump’s presidency calls for a reexamination of democratic traditions, and a renewed commitment to democratic ideals is essential to navigating the uncertainties ahead. As the nation prepares for this next chapter, the dialogue around electoral mechanisms, participatory democracy, and institutional accountability becomes even more crucial in ensuring that American democracy continues to thrive.
