The upcoming presidential election presents a critical moment for Christians, estimated to number around 210 million in the United States, as their voting power can significantly influence the outcome. However, it is concerning that roughly 32 million Christians might choose not to cast their votes. This inaction occurs despite the nation’s growing issues with immorality, corruption, and a departure from the Biblical values upon which the nation was founded. In light of this, Christians are faced with a stark decision between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, evaluating which candidate aligns more closely with their faith and values for the nation’s future. Understanding their comparative records reveals the necessity of determining which candidate represents the greatest attainable good for society.
During his tenure as the 45th President, Donald Trump emerged as a staunch defender of Christian principles. He appointed three Supreme Court Justices who interpret the Constitution from an originalist perspective, positively influencing key rulings that favor Christian values and religious freedoms. Landmark cases like Kennedy v. Bremerton, which secured the rights of public prayer, Dobbs v. Jackson, where Roe v. Wade was overturned, and Groff v. DeJoy, reinforcing worker’s rights to religious observance, demonstrate Trump’s commitment to advancing the Christian worldview. His administration’s policies focused on preserving Biblical teachings in schools and safeguarding a traditional understanding of gender roles, indicating a substantial effort to uphold Christian moral standards.
Trump’s public statements further solidified his position as a champion for Christianity. He expressed pride in his faith and a strong desire to uphold Biblical teachings in public settings. He has been vocal about defending Christian symbols and values against social justice movements that challenge them. After facing assassination attempts, he attributed his survival to God’s grace, underscoring the profound connection he feels to his faith. While recognizing Trump’s imperfections, supporters argue that throughout history, God has utilized flawed individuals for His purposes, similar to how King David, despite his moral failings, was seen as ‘a man after God’s own heart.’
In contrast, Kamala Harris represents a troubling departure from Christian values. Her tenure as vice president and presidential candidate has been marked by actions and statements that directly oppose the faith. Harris’s promotion of “reproductive freedom” has led to unrestrained support for abortion, including late-term procedures, while her public engagements and comments have often disregarded traditional Christian celebrations, labeling Easter instead as a “national day of trans visibility.” Her alignment with the LGBTQ+ movement has often been highlighted through participation in events that many Christians view as morally objectionable, further distancing her from values traditionally held by the Christian community.
Evaluating both candidates brings forth the necessary conclusion that all politicians are inherently flawed and affected by sin, including Trump and Harris. However, the urgency for Christians is to act within the political arena rather than adopt an apathetic stance by dismissing votes for the “lesser of two evils.” To do so would imply a broader disengagement from the political process when every choice is inherently tied to a candidate’s imperfections. Instead, Christians are encouraged to focus on the candidate who can bring about the greatest attainable good for society, aligning values and policies more closely with their beliefs and the teachings of Christianity.
Ultimately, the decision lies with Christian voters to reflect on how their choices can impact the nation’s fundamental values and freedoms. The stakes are high; abstaining from voting could inadvertently pave the way for policies that exacerbate the suffering of families, limit religious freedoms, and promote ideologies counter to Christian teachings. If a large number of Christians choose inaction and Harris secures the presidency by a narrow margin, they could bear responsibility for the potential consequences of her administration’s policies. Therefore, it is imperative for Christians to engage with the electoral process to steer the country toward a future that embraces their convictions and sustains fundamental rights.
