In a provocative article by the German news magazine Der Spiegel, Elon Musk has been labeled “Enemy of the State Number Two,” following former President Donald Trump. This critical characterization paints Musk as a “techno-fascist,” potentially likening him to notorious figures from history, such as Nazi propagandist Alfred Hugenberg, and even Adolf Hitler. The report reflects a deep-seated alarm regarding Musk’s increasing influence and the possibility that he could contribute to the “decomposition of liberal democracy.” It positions Musk in opposition to core liberal values, condemning him for supporting Trump’s agenda and opposing the Biden administration’s open borders policy, which resonates with a significant portion of the American populace.
Der Spiegel contends that Musk has shifted from a tech entrepreneur to a “political agitator” who poses a significant threat to liberal democracy. The magazine argues that his support for right-wing politics, echoed by his public presence on social media platforms, further complicates his image. Musk’s behavior, characterized as reminiscent of an “authoritarian guru,” raises concerns about the way he uses his platform X to propagate narratives opposing migrants, mainstream media, and social progressivism. The article charges him with perpetuating conspiracy theories that could undermine public trust in Democratic institutions, and also cites personal accounts suggesting a deteriorating mental state and a misogynistic attitude.
The most significant anxiety expressed by Der Spiegel pertains to Musk’s relationship with Trump. The possibility of Musk taking a role in a Trump administration is portrayed as an alarming prospect, with speculation surrounding the implementation of “techno-fascist ideas” if Trump regains power. Although Musk has refuted any formal involvement in a Trump cabinet, he has indicated a willingness to offer insights that could aid in reforming the governmental structures he views as excessively bloated, reflecting his desire for efficiency in governance.
Concerns were also voiced about Musk’s ambitions in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and how these might integrate with his other business ventures, allegedly creating an extensive data-driven power base akin to a “monstrous machine.” This hypothetical synthesis of his corporations could position Musk as a centralized authority in data collection and influence—even suggesting that he and Trump could serve as a formidable leadership duo, labeled as “duo infernal” by the magazine. Such a scenario elicits fears about the potential erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a few.
Musk publicly responded to the article during a Trump campaign event, dismissing the notion of being labeled “enemy number two” of democracy. He insisted on his commitment to upholding the Constitution and ensuring free and fair elections, framing the claims made by Der Spiegel as exaggerated and disconnected from his intentions. Concerned about the implications that such media narratives might have, especially in light of threats against Trump, Musk expressed intentions to enhance his personal security in response to what he perceives as incitements against him and dangerous rhetoric surrounding political figures.
In conclusion, the Der Spiegel article reflects a growing apprehension within European liberal media circles about the convergence of technology, politics, and populism, as exemplified by figures like Musk and Trump. As Musk’s influence expands and his relationships with controversial political leaders solidify, the implications for democracy and governance provoke serious debate. The escalating tensions between Musk’s vision for the future and established democratic values underline the deep ideological rifts present in contemporary political discourse.
