In a recent piece, Jeremiah Hosea articulates a stark warning regarding the state of society in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, delineating a list of eight fundamental principles that he believes were abandoned during this period. These principles, presented in countdown fashion, underscore a deep-seated mistrust toward governmental institutions and major corporations, particularly emphasizing the need for individual autonomy, freedom of choice, and the intrinsic value of questioning authority. Hosea argues that rather than providing a semblance of security and care, governmental measures during the pandemic displayed profound failures, stripping citizens of their rights under the guise of public health and safety.
One of Hosea’s significant points is the distrust of government, which he views as an established principle informed by a history of abuses and controversial decisions, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment and other government failures over the past decades. He critiques both major political parties as being part of a singular, corrupt entity that often prioritizes agenda-driven narratives over the welfare of the people. Hosea contends that the erosion of skepticism towards government during the pandemic represented a disturbing regression away from critical thinking, as many individuals succumbed to blind trust in authorities despite their dubious track records.
Corporations, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, come under critical scrutiny in Hosea’s analysis. He characterizes these entities as profit-driven monopolies that often sacrifice human rights and health in their pursuit of profits. He highlights the potential dangers of legal protections granted to pharmaceutical companies, arguing that such legislation undermines consumer safety and erodes foundational ethical standards across the industry. The author sees the rapid rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations—underpinned by policies like Operation Warp Speed—as emblematic of a larger trend of prioritizing corporate gain over consumer safety and ethical responsibility.
Alongside skepticism of government and corporations, Hosea stresses the importance of maintaining the freedom to question prevailing narratives. He emphasizes that intellectual inquiry should be encouraged rather than stifled, expressing concern over the fact that calling for transparency or scrutiny became increasingly viewed as conspiratorial. Hosea maintains that questioning authority is paramount to the learning process and societal progress, asserting that dismantling censorship is vital for a healthy discourse capable of holding those in power accountable.
Another crucial principle Hosea discusses is the right to freely associate and worship without governmental hindrance. He critiques lockdown measures imposed during the pandemic as excessively interventionist, arguing that they infringed upon natural rights and offered little genuine protection against viral transmission. By contrasting the closure of religious institutions with the continued operation of liquor stores, he underscores the arbitrary nature of such impositions and their implications for individual freedoms. This principle reflects Hosea’s broader critique of how pandemic policy became a means of exerting control over personal lives and freedoms under the guise of public safety.
Ultimately, Hosea reaffirms the significance of bodily autonomy, positing that the concept of “no” underpins personal dignity and agency. He warns against the normalization of coercive practices, particularly in medical procedures such as vaccination mandates, which he claims violate fundamental rights. His reflections serve as a poignant reminder of the need to safeguard individual liberties against systemic encroachments, especially in times of crisis when the veneer of safety can obscure larger implications for freedom and human rights. By stressing the need to regain and uphold these principles, Hosea seeks to inspire a collective reevaluation of societal norms as we navigate towards a future impacted by unprecedented challenges.
