Alex Cooper, the host of the popular podcast “Call Her Daddy,” has recently faced a backlash from fans after her interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. Known for its candid discussions on a variety of topics, including sexuality and empowerment, the podcast is now embroiled in controversy as many listeners accuse Cooper of promoting propaganda for the Democratic Party’s 2024 presidential campaign. This criticism particularly intensified given Harris’s choice of interview platforms, as she has been more inclined to converse with friendly hosts rather than engage in traditional media interviews where she might be challenged on her policies.
The anger from Cooper’s audience escalated especially after the podcast aired, coincidentally during a crisis involving Hurricane Helene, which severely affected numerous communities. Many fans expressed their disappointment that the interview seemed to prioritize lighthearted conversation over addressing serious issues such as the hurricane’s aftermath. One listener criticized Cooper for presenting a soft interview while others pointed out that Harris did not seem inclined to deal with pressing national issues during the chat. Comments on social media displayed a consensus among angry fans who felt that the podcast’s integrity was compromised, leading them to threaten to stop listening altogether.
Cooper’s interview with Harris marked a notable moment as it was one of the few times Harris engaged with a non-traditional media figure. Despite being the second most popular podcast in the U.S., the choice to host a political figure known for avoiding tough questions drew ire from Cooper’s audience. The Instagram teaser for the episode showcased the interview as a light discussion, which some loyal fans interpreted as an affront to the serious topics often covered by the podcast. Disappointment brewed as listeners felt the interview did not reflect the urgency and gravity of the national discourse at the time.
Critics also argued that Harris, a key political figure, had purposely selected platforms like “Call Her Daddy” to sidestep the more challenging encounters she might face on traditional media channels. Harris’s decision to turn down opportunities with more confrontational hosts while cultivating a friendly atmosphere with Cooper has contributed to the narrative that she is avoiding accountability. This trend was further underlined by the mounting criticism regarding her administration’s insufficient response to Hurricane Helene, which many of Cooper’s fans felt should have been addressed during the discussion.
In the wake of the podcast episode, Cooper’s followers expressed their frustration not only on social media but also through interactive features on platforms like YouTube, where they downvoted the interview. Many fans linked their criticisms of the podcast episode to Harris’s apparent lack of engagement with urgent national crises, declaring that their disappointment with the interview reflected a deeper disillusionment with political discourse as affected by media choices. This reaction underscores a broader concern among podcast audiences about the responsibilities of public figures and the potential consequences for entertainers who engage with them.
Ultimately, the fallout from Cooper’s interview with Harris highlights the complicated relationship between media personalities and their audiences, especially when political figures are involved. While “Call Her Daddy” has carved a niche for itself in discussions of contemporary issues, the choice to engage with a high-profile political figure amidst pressing national crises has led to a schism among fans. As Cooper navigates the backlash, it raises questions about the boundaries of entertainment, politics, and the expectations placed on media figures to discuss pertinent social issues in real-time. The incident serves as a reminder that audiences are increasingly vigilant regarding the content they consume and the implications of platform choices in shaping public discourse.
