As the U.S. heads into the November elections, election officials are increasingly aware of new threats, particularly the rise of bogus bomb threats and fake active shooter alerts aimed at disrupting the process. These deceptive practices, known as “swatting,” have emerged as significant concerns for state and federal administrations, particularly because they serve to instill fear among election workers and voters alike. Over the past two years, police across the nation have reported a surge in false emergency calls instigated by political bullies and those seeking notoriety, creating an atmosphere of tension and fear surrounding the electoral process. Many jurisdictions are preparing for the possibility of these attacks, recognizing that the impact of a hoax threat could be severe—potentially leading to real violence, voter intimidation, or chaos at polling stations.
Election officials are proactively addressing the threat of swatting by engaging in preemptive measures and strategic planning. Notably, officials like Amanda Gonzalez, clerk in Jefferson County, Colorado, emphasize the importance of discussing the potential for such incidents and establishing clear protocols. This planning involves sharing contact information and addresses of election officials and key locations with local law enforcement to ensure a swift and informed response if the need arises. Arizona’s Secretary of State Adrian Fontes echoed these sentiments, indicating that law enforcement will approach emergencies involving election officials with heightened caution. The collaborative effort to mitigate swatting incidents demonstrates a resilient approach among election officials who aim to safeguard the integrity and safety of the electoral process.
The high stakes of the upcoming elections, particularly in battleground states, have made election sites appealing targets for disruption. Cybersecurity experts highlight that many swatting incidents trace back to a faction of young, English-speaking individuals embroiled in online communities that prioritize chaos and notoriety over political motives. The growing trend of swatting has captured the attention of authorities due to the potential for significant ramifications, threatening not only election integrity but also the physical safety of those involved. Former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Chris Krebs, described the election period as one that would attract these disruptors, comparing it to “moths to a flame.” Experts also recognize the looming possibility of foreign actors exploiting these domestic disturbances as part of larger disruptive strategies.
The bitter partisanship that characterizes the current political landscape exacerbates concerns about swatting incidents. Election officials, such as Gonzalez and Sara Tindall Ghazal from Georgia’s State Election Board, have noted how their identities as underrepresented figures in government can make them more susceptible to attacks. Recent history illustrates the potential dangers, as some officials have already faced swatting attacks related to their decisions on contentious political issues. For instance, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows experienced a swatting incident following her controversial ruling on former President Trump’s eligibility. These examples underscore the risks faced by election officials while navigating a politically charged environment, and the need for enhanced security and safety measures.
In response to the surge in swatting incidents, many election officials across the country are implementing robust security strategies to mitigate potential threats. Leaders have begun developing detailed contingency plans in collaboration with law enforcement and federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, to prepare for any disruptions on Election Day. Measures include shared communications protocols, training exercises, and heightened physical security at polling locations and election facilities. Officials in Georgia and Arizona, for instance, are taking initiatives to keep law enforcement informed about the locations of critical election sites, while also incorporating comprehensive training drills to ensure readiness for emergencies.
Physical security enhancements are becoming increasingly necessary, with many jurisdictions adapting their facilities to deter potential threats. In Arizona, the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center has fortified its defenses with steel fences, reflecting a growing trend of turning election sites into secure “fortresses.” Key officials, like Republican Bill Gates, have acknowledged this shift in security culture, expressing both concern and reassurance about the state of safety for election workers. However, the need for such extreme measures speaks volumes about the realities faced by election officials amid rising political hostility and the pressing need to protect both electoral integrity and participant safety during a tumultuous election season.