In a recent interview with Greg Hunter on USAWatchdog.com, Martin Armstrong, a renowned financial and geopolitical cycle analyst, shared a series of startling predictions concerning the political landscape in the U.S. Armstrong’s Socrates computer program has a notable track record, having accurately forecasted significant events such as Donald Trump’s landslide victory and a Republican resurgence in Congress, despite mainstream media narratives suggesting otherwise. He also asserted that Vice President Kamala Harris’s true approval rating is around 10%, in stark contrast to the 50% claimed by the media. Armstrong pointed out that both the Democrats and the press are aware of these discrepancies but choose to present a distorted image to the public. Additionally, he predicted that President Joe Biden would ultimately pardon his son, Hunter, despite public denials from the administration.
Armstrong elaborated on the implications behind Biden pardoning Hunter, suggesting that it would symbolize a broader collapse of the rule of law in the U.S. This act, he claimed, would serve as a mechanism for Hunter to be compelled to testify about his financial dealings in Ukraine. Armstrong argued that the pardon would eliminate Hunter’s ability to invoke the Fifth Amendment in any legal proceedings, placing him in a position where he could be incarcerated for contempt if he refused to answer questions about potential corruption involving his father and other prominent figures within the Democrat Party. Reflecting on his own experiences with the law, having been imprisoned for an extended period for contempt, Armstrong pointed out that while his punishment exceeded the legal limit, Hunter could also face serious repercussions, amplifying the potential chaos surrounding future political scenarios.
Armstrong further predicted that Biden would extend pardons to other figures involved in politically charged circumstances, including those related to the January 6 incident and individuals like Anthony Fauci, who has come under scrutiny for his role in public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. He conveyed a sense of urgency about the situation, asserting that these pardons could deliver what he termed the “final nail in the coffin” for the Democratic Party, painting it as a faction rife with corruption. He suggested that these actions would significantly tarnish the party’s image, driving it toward a potential decline—a viewpoint that signals a harsh reckoning for Democratic affiliates as they enter the next election cycle.
When discussing the international stage, Armstrong indicated a grave concern regarding escalating tensions with Russia. He foreshadowed the possibility of a conflict reigniting due to manipulative tactics, such as a false flag incident, potentially designed to implicate Russia and escalate military actions. Armstrong’s predictions underscore a timeline where such provocations may occur before Trump is anticipated to take office again, presenting a scenario laden with tension and unpredictability. He stressed the importance of individuals preparing for potential crises, recommending the accumulation of essential resources, including food, gold, and cash reserves, while simultaneously expressing skepticism about the feasibility of proposals to eliminate paper money in favor of a digital currency.
Amidst chatter of Trump’s probable re-election, Armstrong acknowledged that the former president will encounter unprecedented challenges during his potentially tumultuous four-year term. He mentioned plans for significant protests during Trump’s inauguration, cautioning that these events could be orchestrated to portray him as a dictator, thereby further complicating his administration’s narrative. He articulated a belief that obstructive maneuvers by the so-called “Deep State” will persist in their attempts to undermine Trump’s presidency, highlighting a political battle that transcends mere electoral politics and ventures into the realm of survival for entrenched powers within the government.
Looking further into the future, particularly towards 2026 and beyond, Armstrong expressed a bleak outlook for the U.S. political climate, hinting that the 2024 election may be pivotal and potentially revolutionary in nature. The forecast suggests a landscape fraught with conflict and contention, as the power dynamics shift within the nation. He argued that the impending war with entrenched political entities signifies a desperate struggle, where those accustomed to power will engage in fierce battles to maintain their positions and influence. Armstrong’s perspectives present a grim but engaging overview of what might lie ahead for both the United States and the global context in which it operates, prompting individuals to consider their own positions amidst the volatility that looms on the horizon. He urged viewers to stay engaged with his ongoing analyses, suggesting that developments in the political realm will demand constant attention and preparedness in response to evolving circumstances.