In the recent article by Bob Unruh on WND.com, a new database has emerged that categorizes the twelve hospitals in the United States where children are reportedly subjected to what the author refers to as “transgender agenda injuries.” This “Dirty Dozen” list highlights hospitals accused of engaging in practices that include prescribing puberty blockers and performing surgical procedures on minors. Mat Staver, head of Liberty Counsel, condemns these practices, equating them to child mutilation for profit and asserting that it is biologically impossible to change one’s gender. According to him, the medical community must revert to scientifically valid psychiatric therapies to address mental health issues without inflicting harm on children.
The analysis suggests a correlation between left-leaning political environments and the prevalence of such medical interventions for gender transition. Notably, several hospitals on the list, such as Children’s Hospital Colorado and Seattle Children’s, are located in states characterized by liberal policies. The report implies that these institutions have been more inclined to support gender transitions and interventions, reflecting a broader cultural engagement in leftist social agendas that may prioritize ideological conformity over traditional medical ethics and standards.
Included in the list of the twelve hospitals are institutions prominent in pediatric care, such as Boston Children’s Hospital and Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. The institutions were identified based on several criteria: their community activism for gender-related medical interventions, the number of hormone prescriptions, the severity of surgical procedures, and their insurance billing for these interventions. The data reveals Mount Sinai Medical Center as the leading biller, reporting over $8.2 million, followed by Boston Children’s with over $6.5 million, indicating a significant financial aspect to the medical measures being provided.
The report also highlights alarming statistical data concerning the number of young individuals undergoing such treatments—almost 14,000 cases between 2019 and 2023. This figure reflects a perceived trend where a sizeable segment of minors undergoes irreversible surgeries and hormone treatments, with hospitals collectively receiving around $120 million for these procedures. It cites California as a particularly troubling case with a significant number of surgeries performed and minors prescribed gender-altering medications, raising concerns about the motivations and implications of such practices in the healthcare system.
Opponents of these practices, including Liberty Counsel, assert that recent peer-reviewed research contradicts the efficacy and safety of medical interventions for gender transition. They argue that states with easier access to puberty blockers and hormones actually experience increased suicide rates among minors. This data suggests that a substantial majority of children with gender confusion are likely to revert to their assigned gender as they mature, especially with appropriate counseling, indicating a need for more conservative approaches to gender dysphoria rather than immediate medical intervention.
In conclusion, the article sheds light on the contentious debate surrounding gender transitioning practices for minors in America. It calls into question the ethics and motivations behind medical interventions offered by certain hospitals, situated predominantly in liberal states. The data presented raises concerns over the long-term consequences on children’s mental and physical health, pointing toward a decisive need for reassessment of current practices in favor of more traditional and proven psychiatric solutions. Advocates for re-evaluating gender-related medical policies continue to voice their disapproval of what they perceive as a trend towards financial profit at the expense of countless vulnerable children navigating complex issues of identity.